Blog literacki, portal erotyczny - seks i humor nie z tej ziemi
Austin Osman Spare and His Theory of Sigils
by Frater U:.D:.
The end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century was a
time characterized by radical changes and great heretics. The secret lore and
the occult in general were triumphant, and there were good reasons for this:
the triumph of materialist positivism with its Manchester industrialism was
beginning to show its first malice, resulting in social and psychological
uprooting; the destruction of nature had already begun to bear its first
poisonous fruits. In brief, it was a time when it seemed appropriate to
question the belief in technology and the omnipotence of the celebrated
natural sciences. Particularly intellectuals, artists, and the so-called
"Bohemians" became advocates of values critical of civilization in general as
can be seen in the literature of Naturalism, in Expressionist Art and in the
whole Decadent Movement, which was quite notorious at the time. Austin Osman
Spare (1886-1956) was a typical child of this era and, after Aleister Crowley,
he was definitely one of the most interesting occultists and practicing
magicians of the English-speaking world. Nowadays he is basically known only
in this cultural context; [1] internationally, he has received only some
attention in literary circles at best-ironically, in a footnote! This footnote
is found in Mario Praz's pioneering but, unfortunately, rather superficial
work La carne, la morte e il diavolo nella letteratura romantica (The
Romantic Agony, Florence, 1930) where he terms him, together with Aleister
Crowley, a "satanic occultist" [2]-and that is all. Nevertheless, this
important work has at least led many an occult researcher familiar with
literature to Spare. Compared with Aleister Crowley's enigmatic and infamous
life, Austin Osman Spare's existence certainly seemed to befit only a
footnote. Despite his various publications after the turn of the century, he
remained practically unnoticed until the late sixties. He was born in 1886,
the son of a London police officer, and we know very little about his
childhood. He claimed to have experienced while a child an initiation of sorts
by an elderly witch, one Mrs. Paterson who, as far as we know, must have been
quite a Wiccan-like character. Spare found his intellectual and creative
vocation as an artist and illustrator, and he attended the Royal College of
Art, where he soon was celebrated as a forthcoming young artist. But he
rebelled against a bourgeois middle-class career in the arts. Disgusted by
commercialism, he retreated from the artistic scene soon afterwords, though he
still continued editing various magazines for quite a while. From 1927 until
his death, he virtually lived as a weird hermit in a London slum, where he
sometimes held exhibitions in a local pub. People have compared his life with
that of H. P. Lovecraft, and certainly he too was an explorer of the dark
levels of the soul. Around the beginning of the First World War, he released
some privately published editions, and today one can acquire-at least in Great
Britain-numerous, usually highly expensive, reprints of his works. However, we
are primarily interested in two volumes, namely his well-known Book of
Pleasure (Self-Love): The Psychology of Ecstasy (London, 1913) [3] and Kenneth
Grant's excellently researched book [4] in which he, as leader of his own
brand of O.T.O. (Ordo Templi Orientis) and as an expert on Crowley, deals with
the practical aspects of Spare's system as well. Spare's actual philosophy
will not be analyzed in depth here because this is not really necessary for
the practice of sigil theory and it would lead away form the subject of this
study. Before we begin with Spare's theory of sigils, it is perhaps useful to
write a few words about the part sigils play in a magical working. Occidental
magic is known to rest on two main pillars, namely on will and on imagination.
Connected with these are analogous thinking and sybolic images. For example,
Agrippa uses a special sigil for each of the planetary intelligences. These
are not, as has been assumed for quite some time, arbitrarily constructed, nor
were they received by "revelation," but rather they are based on cabbalistic
consideration. [5] The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn also employed sigils
as "images of the souls" of magical entities, which enabled the magician to
establish contact with them; nevertheless, the technique of their construction
was not explained. The same may be said for the O.T.O. under Crowley's
leadership and for the Fraternitas Saturni under Gregorius. The name Agrippa
already hints at the fact that magical sigils have a long historical
tradition, which we will not discuss here because then we would have to cover
the whole complex of occult iconology as well. In general, people think of
"correct" and "incorrect" sigils. The grimoires of the late Middle Ages were
often little else but "magical recipe books" (the frequently criticized Sixth
and Seventh Books of Moses basically applies the same procedure of "select
ingredients, pour in and stir"), and these practitioners believed in the
following principle: to know the "true" name and the "true" sigil of a demon
means to have power over it. Pragmatic Magic, which developed in the Anglo-
Saxon realms, completely tidied up this concept. [6] Often Crowley's revolt in
the Golden Dawn-at first in favor of but soon against Mathers-is seen as the
actual beginning of modern magic. It would certainly not be wrong to say that
Crowley himself was an important supporter of Pragmatic thought in modern
magic. But in the end, the Master Therion preferred to remain within the
hierarchical Dogmatic system due to his Aiwass-revelation in Liber Al vel
Legis. His key phrase "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Love
is the law, love under will," as well as his whole Thelemic concept, prove him
a Dogmatic magician. Not so Austin Osman Spare. He seems to derive from the
individual-anarchistic direction so that we may describe his philosophy,
without undue exaggeration, as a mixture of Lao-Tse, Wicca and Max Stirner.
English magic of the turn of the century was also influenced by an important
young science which would actually achieve its major triumphs only after the
Second World War-the psychology of Sigmund Freud. Before that, Blavatsky's
Isis Unveiled and The Secret Doctrine, as well as Frazer's The Golden Bough,
had given important impulses to the occult in general. William James's
comparitive psychology of religion influenced deeply the intellectuality of
this time, but Freud, Adler, and especially Carl G. Jung eventually effected
major breakthroughs. From then on, people started to consider the unconscious
in earnest. This apparent digression, which had to be kept very short due to
lack of space, is in reality a very important basis for the discussion that
follows. We will not analyze in depth by whom Spare was influenced. Lao-Tse
and Stirner having already been mentioned, we might note numerous others from
Swinburne to Crowley himself, in whose order, the A:.A:., Spare had been a
member at least for a short while. Rather, we will discuss his greatest
achievement-his psychological approach towards magic. This leads us to magical
practice proper. In Spare's system there are no "correct" or "incorrect"
sigils; neither is there a list of ready-made symbols. It is of no import
whether a sigil is the "correct" one or not, but it is crucial that it has
been created by the magician and is therefore meaningful to him/her. Because
s/he has constructed it for personal use, the sigil easily becomes a catalyst
of his/her magical desire, and sometimes it will even waken this desire in the
first place. This Pragmatic approach which dominates present-day Anglo-Saxon
magic (Israel Regardie, Francis King, Stephen Skinner, W. B. Gray, David
Conway, Lemuel Johnstone, to name but a few relevant authors) goes to show
that Austin Osman Spare, rather than Aleister Crowley, should be considered
the real Father of modern Pragmatic Magic. [7] In the German-speaking
countries, the situation is quite different. Writers like Quintscher,
Gregorius, Bardon, Klingsor and even Spiesberger allow but little room to
maneuver when creating magical coordinates individually. Here the adept is
expected to grow into a ready-made system instead of fashioning one. This is a
completely different approach, the value or non-value of which we will not
discuss here. The nearest thing to Pragmatic Magic, existing already in 1917
i.e. 1921 (the date of the second revised edition of his major work on magic
as an experimental science), was Staudenmaier. The works by Mahamudra, which
have of late been receiving some attention, are mainly of a descriptive nature
and deal with traditions and new interpretations, thus remaining within the
context of German magical heritage; however, they do take heed of recent
results in scientific psychology and are, therefore, at least partially
related to the Pragmatic approach. Pragmatic Magic will become more and more
important because today's magicians have to face a psychologized-and
psychologizing-environment whose philosophical relativism has been shaping all
of us, and still does. Regardless of the significance or amount of truth one
concedes to psychology/psychoanalysis, we all are infiltrated by its way of
thinking and its vocabulary. So even we magicians will have to attain to a
critical, sensible look at it. It will be left to another era to find
different models of explanation, description and practice. How does Spare
proceed in practice? Sigils are developed by fusion and stylization of letters
(see Figure 1). First of all, a sentence of desire has to be formulated. Let
us take the example Spare himself gives in his Book of Pleasure, the
declaration of intent:
THIS MY WISH TO OBTAIN THE STRENGTH OF A TIGER
>>>>> This sentence must be written down in capitals. Next, all the letters
which appear more than once are deleted so that only one of each letter
remains. [Ed. Note: The asterisks denote crossed out letters. Also beginning
the declaration of intent with THIS MY WILL instead of THIS MY WISH may prove
more efficacious.]
THIS MY W*** *O *B*A*N **E **R**G** *F * *****
Thus, the following letters remain: T,H,I,S,M,Y,W,O,B,A,N,E,R,G,F. The sigil
is created from these letters; it is permissible to consider one part (for
example, M) as a reversed W or, seen from the side, as an E. Hence, these
three letters do not have to appear in the sigil three separate times. Of
course, there are numerous possibilities of representation and stylization.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<